Chemical Time Bombs Ticking in Your Body

Plastic and the Ocean

A styrene metabolite in my pee?

Recently, I took a urine organic acids test, which measures metabolites – the end breakdown of various chemical substances  – in the urine.

The test is not intended to measure levels of environmental toxins in the body.  It just happens to measure mandelic acid, a  metabolite from the breakdown of styrene.  High mandelic acid usually occurs from exposure to styrene.

I was surprised to find that my level of mandelic acid was slightly elevated.  This might be due to the normal metabolism of the neurotransmitters phenylalanine or tyrosine since the levels were not extremely high, but it got me wondering.

What Is Styrene and Why Is It a Problem?

Styrene (vinyl benzene) is commonly found in plastic and, of course, Styrofoam.  On June 10, 2011, the US National Toxicology Program described styrene as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen“.

US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) studies on Americans have shown that 100% of human fat samples contain styrene.  Once in the body, there’s no mechanism for getting all of the styrene out.

Continue Reading

The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010

The Story of Cosmetics

The U. S. cosmetics industry is all riled up.  I wonder why they don’t like the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010?  And, they really don’t like Annie Leonard’s terrific video The Story of Cosmetics.

In fact, the Personal Care Products Council has even issued a statement calling the video a “repugnant and absurd…shockumentary.”

Obviously, the video is not to be missed!

Just click on the link above to hear all about the lead in your lipstick, petrochemicals in your shampoo, and the phthalates in perfume and fragrance.

Yes, hundreds of chemicals in the cosmetics and personal care products you and I use every single day.  Neurotoxins, carcinogens, hormone disrupters, and more as explained by the Environmental Working Group:

“According to EWG’s research, 22 percent of all personal care products, including children’s products, may contain a cancer-causing ingredient, 1,4-Dioxane, and 60 percent of sunscreens contain oxybenzone, a potential hormone disruptor. Other studies have raised alarms about lead in lipstick, secret chemicals in fragrance and preservatives in personal care products.”

Now this is not news to me because I know a number of people who have varioius physical reactions when exposed to the chemicals in cosmetics, fragrance, and cleaning products ranging from mild to severe.  Some  have even developed serious multiple chemical sensitivity or environmental illness.

The numbers are adding up and the medical establishment can no longer blow off chemical sensitivity as psychogenic.  In fact, there’s now scientific research tracing the causes of chemical sensitivity to toxic chemicals.  Furthermore, women are up in arms about the dramatic rise in chronic disease among children and the explosion of allergies and asthma in the young.

The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010 (HR 5786) in a nutshell

According to the Story of Stuff blog,

“The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010 also would require all ingredients in a cosmetic product to be listed on the product’s label and would give the Secretary of Health and Human Services two years to develop a list of prohibited or restricted ingredients.”

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics says:

“The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010, introduced by U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky with Rep. Edward Markey and Rep. Tammy Baldwin, is a huge moment for consumers, parents and environmental health advocates: for the first time in 70 years, we have a real chance to pass national legislation that would eliminate harmful chemicals from the products women, men and children put on their bodies every day.”

Everyone’s talking about the Story of Cosmetics

Everyone’s talking about Annie Leonard’s video, the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010, and their own problems with the unnatural ingredients in cosmetics.

Lead in lipstick!

Beth Terry at Fake Plastic Fish recounts the effects of sitting next to the wrong person on an airplane.

“Flying home from Maryland on Saturday, I sat next to a really cute guy. Unfortunately, the plane was completely full, so I couldn’t switch seats to get away from him. Well, not him. He was cute. But his Axe cologne, or whatever heinous product he was wearing, made my eyes water, nose itch, throat close up, and left me with a throbbing headache.

I reached for a handkerchief to cover my nose, but sadly my very helpful dad had tossed in a Bounce dryer sheet when he did my laundry, and my hanky just made me sneeze even more.”

This could suddenly happen to you one day, too.  As Beth goes on to explain, you become more and more sensitized with repeated exposure to environmental chemicals like those found in your everyday personal care and cleaning products.  One day, you just wake up and start sneezing when you pick up a pile of laundry washed in standard detergent and fabric softener.  The symptoms can then multiply like wildfire. While some people develop acute and chronic reactions to the toxic chemicals themselves, others may never know that these same noxious toxins contributed to the onset of cancer, autoimmune disease, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, or another disorder.

Petrol Essences

At Upcycled Love, Lynn Fang, scientist by day and blogger by night, describes her personal investigation into toxins in her personal care items starting with the sodium lauryl sulfate (a major skin irritant) and parabens (which have estrogen-like effects) in her shampoo and conditioner. Lynn offers two important tips for becoming a smarter shopping in the cosmetics and personal care department.  She also lists non-toxic alternatives in her article.

What can you do?

The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010 presents an unprecedented opportunity to speak out for safe ingredients in your cosmetics and personal care products.  For your own safety and the safety of your children, please consider taking the following steps.

1. Educate yourself and your family.

  • Learn about the effects of toxins in our everyday products on children at Healthy Child, Healthy World.
  • Watch The Story of Cosmetics video by Annie Leonard (link above) and follow The Story of Stuff blog.
  • Watch The Story Behind Cosmetics by the Environmental Working Group (different video, same topic) and read the Environmental Working Group’s blog to stay abreast of the most potent news about environmental toxins and public health.
  • Visit Fake Plastic Fish and Upcycled Love (links above) to read about what ordinary women like you and me are finding out about their cosmetics and what they’re doing about it.

2. Vote with your dollars. Use the EWG’s Skin Deep Cosmetics Safety Data Base to evaluate the safety of a cosmetic or personal care product product before you purchase it. Refuse popular products like Herbal Essences and Pantene Pro that contain potentially dangerous chemicals.

3. Support the Cosmetics Safety Act of 2010. Let Congress know that you support the Cosmetics Safety Act of 2010. Visit the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics website to sign a letter to your Member of Congress. Make sure your voice is heard.

4.  Share the links. Share the links to the two videos—the Story of Cosmetics and the Story Behind Cosmetics—via your social networks like Facebook and Twitter.  Thanks to people like you and me, more than 50,000 people viewed the Story of Cosmetics on July 21 alone. Let’s keep the ball rolling.

5. Blog about it. If you have a blog, blog about the potential dangers contained in our personal care products, the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010, and share the links in this article.

6. Throw a Story of Cosmetics and the Story Behind Cosmetics Viewing Party and dialogue with your friends.

I’m very excited about this monumental step forward to raise public awareness about the dangers of environmental chemicals in our everyday products. Thank you to U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky, who introduced the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010. Thank you to all the audacious women who are getting the cosmetic industry all riled up.

As Annie Leonard says, “Toxins In, Toxins Out.” Together, we can help take toxic chemicals off the shelf.

What do you think about toxic chemicals in cosmetics?

If you liked this article, please share the link.  Thank you!  Sandra

Share

An eco-friendly, green world

What will our new eco-friendly, green world look like?

Activate your imagination and let your wildest dreams surge forth.  Paint a clear picture—it can and will become real.

The oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico catapulted many into deep despair and anger.  Yet, in the end, the accident could very well serve as the impetus for massive change aimed at saving this endangered planet.  The catastrophic oil accident mixed with the accelerating impacts of climate change has become a potent call to action.

People in the “developed” world are waking up in droves to the horrible impact of our over-the-top oil addiction. This addictive behavior harms not just us, but also the people and environments in the countries producing our toxic products en masse.  More and more individuals are taking personal responsibility and finding ways to reduce their oil consumption.

Environmental change or clever spin?

Likewise, more companies are embracing eco-friendlier approaches to production and product marketing.  As an example, I recently found this message at the bottom of a Timberland shoe box printed on top of a stencil of a shoe sole:

“What kind of footprint will you leave?”

Great question! On the inside of the box top, Timberland assures us:

“And yes, of course, this box is made from 100% post consumer recycled materials and printed with soy and water based inks.  Reuse it.  Then recycle it.”

Timberland continues the inner box top script asking the question, “How will we change today?”   The company answers itself with these words, “The opportunity to make it better is everywhere if we choose to act.” It kindly provides a small list of inspiring opportunities for action.

Good work, Timberland. I applaud your enlightened efforts.  Every step in a green direction is positive and should not be denigrated.  At the same time, we need to ask, “Is this enough?”  First steps are critical, but let them not be the only steps.  As consumers, we need to have a discerning eye to distinguish between truly effective, visionary action and marketing chíc.

I don’t want to pick on Timberland unfairly because it engages in multiple endeavors to sustain the environment.  The company has a long-term strategy to become carbon neutral by 2010, it uses a portion of recycled materials in its products, and offers a collection called ‘Earthkeepers™’ especially intended to have a smaller environmental footprint.

I can’t help but ask, shouldn’t all our products be Earthkeepers™? I hope that’s the ultimate intention.

A good fraction of Timberland’s footwear continues to be constructed from leather. As most of you know, factory farming utilizes a high proportion of environmental resources in addition to its other detrimental effects. Timberland is without question moving in the right direction, but is it enoughWhat else can be done?

It’s up to us as consumers to educate ourselves and ask penetrating questions again and again.  At the same time, we need to curb our own appetite for the frivolous and reduce the market for high-resource products like leather by making alternative choices.  Companies respond to markets and consumers shape markets.  The power is in our hands if we unite in the same direction.

Full-out greenwashing

On the other end of the spectrum is full out ‘greenwashing‘—claiming a product to be organic and natural when it’s not. One example of a confusing marketing message is offered by Herbal Essences, the #2 selling shampoo in America produced by Proctor and Gamble.

Petrol Essences

In the brief, informative, and dynamic video, The Story of Cosmetics, Annie Leonard asks, “Since when do herbs come from petroleum?”  Do not be fooled, Herbal Essences has very little in the way of herbal essences.  Its ingredients include one petroleum derived product after another.

Who can we really trust? Apparently, not Proctor and Gamble.  The same type of greenwahsing goes on with products commonly found at your health food store too.

Here are some “organic” brands that may not be living up to their promise:  Amazon Organics, Avalon Organics, Desert Essence Organics, Earth’s Best Organic, Giovanni Organic Cosmetics, Head Organics, JASON Pure Natural and Organic, Nature’s Gate Organics, Organics by Noah’s Naturals.

Staying educated and abreast of green affairs is critical.  Otherwise, you are at risk for being hoodwinked by empty eco-friendly marketing claims.

Climate-neutral production?

Reducing a company’s “carbon footprint” is now common lingo, but is it real and will it make enough of a difference?  I recently received a Super Saver booklet in the mail from KTA market.  On the back, I found this carbon neutral statement:

KTA Super Stores is a sustainable contributor to voluntary climate protection by producing each Super Saver in a climate-neutral manner and offsetting Co2 emissions through the following approved climate protection project… KTA Super Stores is the first supermarket in the nation to participate in the natureOffice carbon neutral program.  This Super Saver is also recyclable and made with 20% recycled fiber.”

Is it just me?  I found it humorous to be told that this Super Saver is “recyclable” as if this were a unique innovation developed by KTA. Maybe I’m missing something here, but hasn’t paper always been recyclable?  Before getting too excited about its recyclable potential, read on to see that the booklet is only made of 20% recycled fiber.  What about the other 80%?

Why am I even receiving this 78-page booklet addressed to “resident” in the mail? I don’t shop at KTA, I haven’t requested the booklet, and I don’t need it.  In my case, it goes directly in the recycle bin.  Others may trash it. What a waste!  Does functioning in such a wasteful way nullify efforts to become carbon-neutral to any degree, I wonder?

When it comes right down to it, the vast majority of products in any super market are not essential to humankind’s survival nor are they particularly green.  They are swathed in plastic packaging, which is derived from petroleum, and typically transported for thousands of miles.  Again, I bow to KTA’s commitment to produce its booklet in a carbon neutral fashion.  It’s a good start, but don’t we need to do a little bit more than this to actually turn around climate change and liberate ourselves from oil dependence?  Re-thinking what we eat as well as what and how much we really need given the epidemic of obesity might be a great place to start.

Once again, as consumers, it’s up to ask to keep asking the piercing questions.  Let’s not be fooled by fallacious marketing claims or modest but limited attempts toward safer and saner production methods. Too much is at stake to believe that corporations suddenly have our green interest at heart.  Let’s celebrate every positive step, but be sure to voice the highest expectations.

You have the power to effect change every time you purchase a product. In Small Ways to Make a Big Difference, Karen Ruby from the blog A Meaningful Existence suggests,

“Every dollar in your pocket is a vote. Don’t forget it. Every single one is counted. It’s a failsafe system. It’s perfect democracy.”

What will our new green, eco-friendly world look like?

Personal development experts speak about ‘life-design.’  Even more critical is the remarkable opportunity before us to express our collective creative and imaginative forces for the purpose of a wide-sweeping ‘planet-redesign.’  Instead of becoming discouraged or depressed about the oil spill, become creative, proactive, and visionary.  A green, life-affirming trend is already gaining tremendous momentum.

The blog Treehugger says the transition away from oil based products will be a decades long process.  A full 71%  of oil goes to transportation—transporting ourselves and the goods and foods we purchase. Treehugger advises,

“…if we want to really use less oil, we have to construct our communities, our product manufacture and distribution chains so that less daily travel is needed. So the average person doesn’t need to own a car at all. We have to create more walkable and bikeable communities. Beyond that we need to re-localize and regionalize economic activity for all those goods which can be produced in this way–recognizing that not everything can or should.”

Reducing the number of oil-based products you use is important for a whole range of reasons like waste, pollution, and health, but the biggest gains will come from driving and flying less and walking and biking more.

According to the Nature Conservancy, if everyone cut their daily driving by 5.4 miles, the U.S. could halt drilling in the Gulf of Mexico altogether. Treehugger recommends moving closer to where you work and living in smaller-scale communities.  Buying local products is another huge part of the equation, since a good proportion of the 75% of oil use goes to transporting food and products.

At Upcycled Love, Lynn Fang speaks passionately about  a ‘Sustainable Economy,‘ in which businesses evolve to “revere the triple bottom line: people, planet, profit.”  Lynn says:

“The possibility of a sustainable economy means there is a way we can run our society without completely depleting our resources. There is a way we can live happily, with profit, and with care to our environment. The issue is not whether it is a possibility, the issue is how we’re going to get there.”

It is possible. I find the prospect of reconstructing our communities in more ideal ways a fascinating challenge.  This is the creative task before us in this time of unfathomable potential for building a bright new future.  It all begins with living simply and consciously so others may simply live.

What’s your vision for our new eco-friendly, green world?

If you liked this post, please share it with others.  Thanks very much!  Sandra

Share

Kid-safe chemicals

The Environmental Working Group “tested the umbilical cord blood of 10 newborn babies and found nearly 300 chemicals, including BPA, fire retardants, lead, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and pesticides that were banned more than 30 years ago.”

They say: “Bills to overhaul federal toxic chemicals policies are now moving through Congress. They would require that all chemicals be proven safe for children before they can be sold. Lawmakers in Washington need to know that you want strong reforms for our broken toxics law.”

You can make a difference!  Join 93,500 people who care.

It will take just a moment. Make a difference by signing the Kid Safe Chemicals Petition.  Just follow the link.

Babies don’t have a choice, but you do!

Please share this link with others:

Share